From 6b359d5550a1ae7a1269c9dc1dd73dfdc4d6fe58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alaa Hleihel Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 10:38:14 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Check for SQ and not RQ state when modifying hairpin SQ When modifying hairpin SQ, instead of checking if the next state equals to MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY, we compare it against the MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY enum value. The code worked since both of MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY and MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY have the same value today. This patch fixes this issue. Fixes: 18e568c390c6 ("net/mlx5: Hairpin pair core object setup") Change-Id: I6758aa7b4bd137966ae28206b70648c5bc223b46 Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c index dae1c5c5d27c..d2f76070ea7c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int mlx5_hairpin_modify_sq(struct mlx5_core_dev *peer_mdev, u32 sqn, sqc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(modify_sq_in, in, ctx); - if (next_state == MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY) { + if (next_state == MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY) { MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_rq, peer_rq); MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_vhca, peer_vhca); } -- 2.11.0