From 6c07ef298ac2a05e14cdb059169a78c74badf056 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:32:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] spi/atmel: Annotate lock/unlock functions Let checkers like sparse know that the locking imbalances are intentional in these functions. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c index 4c6c455685c2..4e406930fa52 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c @@ -360,12 +360,12 @@ static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi) gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, !active); } -static void atmel_spi_lock(struct atmel_spi *as) +static void atmel_spi_lock(struct atmel_spi *as) __acquires(&as->lock) { spin_lock_irqsave(&as->lock, as->flags); } -static void atmel_spi_unlock(struct atmel_spi *as) +static void atmel_spi_unlock(struct atmel_spi *as) __releases(&as->lock) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&as->lock, as->flags); } -- 2.11.0