From 70eae03087a3101493d9a1cf60c86c5f65600822 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 12:03:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/xen: Fix SRCU/RCU usage in readers of evtchn_ports The evtchnfd structure itself must be protected by either kvm->lock or SRCU. Use the former in kvm_xen_eventfd_update(), since the lock is being taken anyway; kvm_xen_hcall_evtchn_send() instead is a reader and does not need kvm->lock, and is called in SRCU critical section from the kvm_x86_handle_exit function. It is also important to use rcu_read_{lock,unlock}() in kvm_xen_hcall_evtchn_send(), because idr_remove() will *not* use synchronize_srcu() to wait for readers to complete. Remove a superfluous if (kvm) check before calling synchronize_srcu() in kvm_xen_eventfd_deassign() where kvm has been dereferenced already. Co-developed-by: Michal Luczaj Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse Message-Id: <20221226120320.1125390-3-dwmw2@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c index 929b887eafd7..9b75457120f7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c @@ -1808,20 +1808,23 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, { u32 port = data->u.evtchn.send_port; struct evtchnfd *evtchnfd; + int ret; if (!port || port >= max_evtchn_port(kvm)) return -EINVAL; + /* Protect writes to evtchnfd as well as the idr lookup. */ mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); evtchnfd = idr_find(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, port); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + ret = -ENOENT; if (!evtchnfd) - return -ENOENT; + goto out_unlock; /* For an UPDATE, nothing may change except the priority/vcpu */ + ret = -EINVAL; if (evtchnfd->type != data->u.evtchn.type) - return -EINVAL; + goto out_unlock; /* * Port cannot change, and if it's zero that was an eventfd @@ -1829,20 +1832,21 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, */ if (!evtchnfd->deliver.port.port || evtchnfd->deliver.port.port != data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.port) - return -EINVAL; + goto out_unlock; /* We only support 2 level event channels for now */ if (data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.priority != KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_XEN_EVTCHN_PRIO_2LEVEL) - return -EINVAL; + goto out_unlock; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); evtchnfd->deliver.port.priority = data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.priority; if (evtchnfd->deliver.port.vcpu_id != data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.vcpu) { evtchnfd->deliver.port.vcpu_id = data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.vcpu; evtchnfd->deliver.port.vcpu_idx = -1; } + ret = 0; +out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); - return 0; + return ret; } /* @@ -1935,8 +1939,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, u32 port) if (!evtchnfd) return -ENOENT; - if (kvm) - synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu); + synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu); if (!evtchnfd->deliver.port.port) eventfd_ctx_put(evtchnfd->deliver.eventfd.ctx); kfree(evtchnfd); @@ -1989,14 +1992,18 @@ static bool kvm_xen_hcall_evtchn_send(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 param, u64 *r) /* Sanity check: this structure is the same for 32-bit and 64-bit */ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(send) != 4); - if (kvm_read_guest_virt(vcpu, param, &send, sizeof(send), &e)) { *r = -EFAULT; return true; } - /* The evtchn_ports idr is protected by vcpu->kvm->srcu */ + /* + * evtchnfd is protected by kvm->srcu; the idr lookup instead + * is protected by RCU. + */ + rcu_read_lock(); evtchnfd = idr_find(&vcpu->kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, send.port); + rcu_read_unlock(); if (!evtchnfd) return false; -- 2.11.0