From 73dc707161a83c24a9e6804b2d60e6f4a4d6be74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guoqing Jiang Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:59:40 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: remove conflicting comment from __ext4_forget We do a bforget and return for no journal case, so let's remove this conflict comment. Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210714055940.1553705-1-guoqing.jiang@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o --- fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c index b96ecba91899..b60f0152ea57 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c @@ -244,9 +244,6 @@ int __ext4_journal_get_write_access(const char *where, unsigned int line, * "bh" may be NULL: a metadata block may have been freed from memory * but there may still be a record of it in the journal, and that record * still needs to be revoked. - * - * If the handle isn't valid we're not journaling, but we still need to - * call into ext4_journal_revoke() to put the buffer head. */ int __ext4_forget(const char *where, unsigned int line, handle_t *handle, int is_metadata, struct inode *inode, -- 2.11.0