From 7d552a48089b6a24b65abe9c49a184bae8364abe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:17:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: block: introduce new_areq and old_areq Recycling the same variable in an x=x+1 fashion may seem clever here but it makes the code terse and hard to follow for humans. Introduce a new_areq and old_areq variable so we see what is going on. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson --- drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c index ea86a233cea4..fc71b6256d35 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c @@ -1634,7 +1634,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) enum mmc_blk_status status; struct mmc_queue_req *mq_rq; struct request *req; - struct mmc_async_req *areq; + struct mmc_async_req *new_areq; + struct mmc_async_req *old_areq; if (!rqc && !mq->mqrq_prev->req) return 0; @@ -1654,11 +1655,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) } mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, 0, mq); - areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active; + new_areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active; } else - areq = NULL; - areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, &status); - if (!areq) { + new_areq = NULL; + + old_areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, new_areq, &status); + if (!old_areq) { /* * We have just put the first request into the pipeline * and there is nothing more to do until it is @@ -1673,7 +1675,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) * An asynchronous request has been completed and we proceed * to handle the result of it. */ - mq_rq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active); + mq_rq = container_of(old_areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active); brq = &mq_rq->brq; req = mq_rq->req; type = rq_data_dir(req) == READ ? MMC_BLK_READ : MMC_BLK_WRITE; -- 2.11.0