From 8b94db17a43a9d847fb088ac49bafde15ba61a6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brendon Cahoon Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:06:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix a type mismatch assert in SCEV division An assert was triggered when attempting to create a new SCEV with operands of different types in the visitAddRecExpr. In this test case, the operand types of the numerator and denominator are different. The SCEV division code should generate a conservative answer when this happens. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9021 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235511 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp | 8 +++++++ test/Analysis/Delinearization/type_mismatch.ll | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test/Analysis/Delinearization/type_mismatch.ll diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp index d88b0268651..9d99b8f77c9 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp @@ -795,6 +795,14 @@ public: assert(Numerator->isAffine() && "Numerator should be affine"); divide(SE, Numerator->getStart(), Denominator, &StartQ, &StartR); divide(SE, Numerator->getStepRecurrence(SE), Denominator, &StepQ, &StepR); + // Bail out if the types do not match. + Type *Ty = Denominator->getType(); + if (Ty != StartQ->getType() || Ty != StartR->getType() || + Ty != StepQ->getType() || Ty != StepR->getType()) { + Quotient = Zero; + Remainder = Numerator; + return; + } Quotient = SE.getAddRecExpr(StartQ, StepQ, Numerator->getLoop(), Numerator->getNoWrapFlags()); Remainder = SE.getAddRecExpr(StartR, StepR, Numerator->getLoop(), diff --git a/test/Analysis/Delinearization/type_mismatch.ll b/test/Analysis/Delinearization/type_mismatch.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0aa9a96cb1f --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Analysis/Delinearization/type_mismatch.ll @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -delinearize +; REQUIRES: asserts + +; Test that SCEV divide code doesn't crash when attempting to create a SCEV +; with operands of different types. In this case, the visitAddRecExpr +; function tries to create an AddRec where the start and step are different +; types. + +target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-a:0-v32:32-n16:32" + +define fastcc void @test() { +entry: + %0 = load i16, i16* undef, align 2 + %conv21 = zext i16 %0 to i32 + br label %for.cond7.preheader + +for.cond7.preheader: + %p1.022 = phi i8* [ undef, %entry ], [ %add.ptr, %for.end ] + br label %for.body11 + +for.body11: + %arrayidx.phi = phi i8* [ %p1.022, %for.cond7.preheader ], [ undef, %for.body11 ] + store i8 undef, i8* %arrayidx.phi, align 1 + br i1 undef, label %for.body11, label %for.end + +for.end: + %add.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %p1.022, i32 %conv21 + br label %for.cond7.preheader +} -- 2.11.0