From 988a47311952db42b3bf84be0dd515ca7d86aaa3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hyungwon Hwang Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 19:09:24 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] drm/exynos: gsc: fix wrong bitwise operation for swap detection The bits for rotation are not used as exclusively. So GSC_IN_ROT_270 can not be used for swap detection. The definition of it is same with GSC_IN_ROT_MASK. It is enough to check GSC_IN_ROT_90 bit is set or not to check whether width / height size swapping is needed. Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang Signed-off-by: Inki Dae --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c index 8040ed2a831f..f1c6b76c127f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c @@ -593,8 +593,7 @@ static int gsc_src_set_transf(struct device *dev, gsc_write(cfg, GSC_IN_CON); - ctx->rotation = cfg & - (GSC_IN_ROT_90 | GSC_IN_ROT_270) ? 1 : 0; + ctx->rotation = (cfg & GSC_IN_ROT_90) ? 1 : 0; *swap = ctx->rotation; return 0; @@ -857,8 +856,7 @@ static int gsc_dst_set_transf(struct device *dev, gsc_write(cfg, GSC_IN_CON); - ctx->rotation = cfg & - (GSC_IN_ROT_90 | GSC_IN_ROT_270) ? 1 : 0; + ctx->rotation = (cfg & GSC_IN_ROT_90) ? 1 : 0; *swap = ctx->rotation; return 0; -- 2.11.0