From 9ac15b7a8af4cf3337a101498c0ed690d23ade75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:30:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] x86/irq: Copy vectormask instead of an AND operation In the case that the new vector mask is a subset of the existing mask there is no point to do a AND operation of currentmask & newmask. The result is newmask. So we can simply copy the new mask to the current mask and be done with it. Preparatory patch for further consolidation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Borislav Petkov Tested-by: Joe Lawrence Cc: Jiang Liu Cc: Jeremiah Mahler Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com Cc: Guenter Roeck Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.3+ Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151231160106.640253454@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c index 940e18d4dbcd..1bd29c624531 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *d, vector_cpumask); d->move_in_progress = cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask); - cpumask_and(d->domain, d->domain, vector_cpumask); + cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask); goto success; } -- 2.11.0