From a38bc45a08e9759f04d61669f45941d6624d173c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 15:53:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] selftests/net: Fix reuseport_bpf_numa by skipping unavailable nodes In some platforms the numa node numbers are not necessarily consecutive, meaning that not all nodes from 0 to the value returned by numa_max_node() are available on the system. Using node numbers which are not available results on errors from libnuma such as: ---- IPv4 UDP ---- send node 0, receive socket 0 libnuma: Warning: Cannot read node cpumask from sysfs ./reuseport_bpf_numa: failed to pin to node: No such file or directory Fix it by checking if the node number bit is set on numa_nodes_ptr, which is defined on libnuma as "Set with all nodes the kernel has exposed to userspace". Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101145317.286118-1-kleber.souza@canonical.com --- tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c index c9f478b40996..b2eebf669b8c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c @@ -211,12 +211,16 @@ static void test(int *rcv_fd, int len, int family, int proto) /* Forward iterate */ for (node = 0; node < len; ++node) { + if (!numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) + continue; send_from_node(node, family, proto); receive_on_node(rcv_fd, len, epfd, node, proto); } /* Reverse iterate */ for (node = len - 1; node >= 0; --node) { + if (!numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) + continue; send_from_node(node, family, proto); receive_on_node(rcv_fd, len, epfd, node, proto); } -- 2.11.0