From a66122515a5f23d623d99bdf23ea739b87977def Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:29:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [x86] Switch to using the variable we extracted this operand
 into.

Spotted this missed refactoring by inspection when reading code, and it
doesn't changethe functionality at all.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214627 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
index a2bee7a3235..2471667d95b 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ void X86AsmPrinter::EmitInstruction(const MachineInstr *MI) {
       ArrayRef<MachineConstantPoolEntry> Constants =
           MI->getParent()->getParent()->getConstantPool()->getConstants();
       const MachineConstantPoolEntry &MaskConstantEntry =
-          Constants[MI->getOperand(5).getIndex()];
+          Constants[MaskOp.getIndex()];
       Type *MaskTy = MaskConstantEntry.getType();
       (void)MaskTy;
       if (!MaskConstantEntry.isMachineConstantPoolEntry())
-- 
2.11.0