From a90d489ab101891bbac7276b8748125e6b4fa0c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Geoffray Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:30:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix a bug in reference type propagation. The upper bound of a bound type is always exact, so we should not use it for setting the type of the bound type. bug:28730986 Change-Id: I214b8c3493838c22805555f88e8dc87cf9221376 --- compiler/optimizing/reference_type_propagation.cc | 6 ++- test/603-checker-instanceof/expected.txt | 0 test/603-checker-instanceof/info.txt | 2 + test/603-checker-instanceof/src/Main.java | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 test/603-checker-instanceof/expected.txt create mode 100644 test/603-checker-instanceof/info.txt create mode 100644 test/603-checker-instanceof/src/Main.java diff --git a/compiler/optimizing/reference_type_propagation.cc b/compiler/optimizing/reference_type_propagation.cc index f2394f605..15f4928eb 100644 --- a/compiler/optimizing/reference_type_propagation.cc +++ b/compiler/optimizing/reference_type_propagation.cc @@ -809,7 +809,11 @@ void ReferenceTypePropagation::UpdateBoundType(HBoundType* instr) { // Make sure that we don't go over the bounded type. ReferenceTypeInfo upper_bound_rti = instr->GetUpperBound(); if (!upper_bound_rti.IsSupertypeOf(new_rti)) { - new_rti = upper_bound_rti; + // Note that the input might be exact, in which case we know the branch leading + // to the bound type is dead. We play it safe by not marking the bound type as + // exact. + bool is_exact = upper_bound_rti.GetTypeHandle()->CannotBeAssignedFromOtherTypes(); + new_rti = ReferenceTypeInfo::Create(upper_bound_rti.GetTypeHandle(), is_exact); } instr->SetReferenceTypeInfo(new_rti); } diff --git a/test/603-checker-instanceof/expected.txt b/test/603-checker-instanceof/expected.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e69de29bb diff --git a/test/603-checker-instanceof/info.txt b/test/603-checker-instanceof/info.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5907abc85 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/603-checker-instanceof/info.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Regression test for the compiler that used to wrongly optimize +an instanceof. diff --git a/test/603-checker-instanceof/src/Main.java b/test/603-checker-instanceof/src/Main.java new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ddf4b92fb --- /dev/null +++ b/test/603-checker-instanceof/src/Main.java @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2016 The Android Open Source Project + * + * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); + * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. + * You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +class SuperClass { +} + +class ChildClass extends SuperClass { +} + +public class Main { + + /// CHECK-START: void Main.main(java.lang.String[]) builder (after) + /// CHECK: BoundType klass:SuperClass can_be_null:false exact:false + + /// CHECK-START: void Main.main(java.lang.String[]) builder (after) + /// CHECK-NOT: BoundType klass:SuperClass can_be_null:false exact:true + public static void main(String[] args) { + Object obj = new ChildClass(); + + // We need a fixed point iteration to hit the bogus type update + // of 'obj' below, so create a loop that updates the type of 'obj'. + for (int i = 1; i < 1; i++) { + obj = new Object(); + } + + if (obj instanceof SuperClass) { + // We used to wrongly type obj as an exact SuperClass from this point, + // meaning we were statically determining that the following instanceof + // would always fail. + if (!(obj instanceof ChildClass)) { + throw new Error("Expected a ChildClass, got " + obj.getClass()); + } + } + } +} -- 2.11.0