From cf33de1799c65fd05fcf18b5983ac9b2640be1e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Anderson Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:35:25 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Config number of DP lanes Mo' Betta The driver used to say that the value to program into bridge register 0x93 was dp_lanes - 1. Looking at the datasheet for the bridge, this is wrong. The data sheet says: * 1 = 1 lane * 2 = 2 lanes * 3 = 4 lanes A more proper way to express this encoding is min(dp_lanes, 3). At the moment this change has zero effect because we've hardcoded the number of DP lanes to 4. ...and (4 - 1) == min(4, 3). How fortunate! ...but soon we'll stop hardcoding the number of lanes. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Tested-by: Rob Clark Reviewed-by: Rob Clark Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191218143416.v3.4.If3e2d0493e7b6e8b510ea90d8724ff760379b3ba@changeid --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c index 0cb40fa6c0a5..9cc0b2bb36ee 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge) CHA_DSI_LANES_MASK, val); /* DP lane config */ - val = DP_NUM_LANES(pdata->dp_lanes - 1); + val = DP_NUM_LANES(min(pdata->dp_lanes, 3)); regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_SSC_CONFIG_REG, DP_NUM_LANES_MASK, val); -- 2.11.0