From e53946dbd31a21f4bef155f8febba556933d62bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Chinner Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 23:26:05 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] xfs: xfs_iflush_abort() can be called twice on cluster writeback failure When a corrupt inode is detected during xfs_iflush_cluster, we can get a shutdown ASSERT failure like this: XFS (pmem1): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_symlink_shortform_verify+0x5c/0xa0, inode 0x86627 data fork XFS (pmem1): Unmount and run xfs_repair XFS (pmem1): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x8) called from line 3372 of file fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c. Return address = ffffffff814f4116 XFS (pmem1): Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down filesystem XFS (pmem1): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x1) called from line 222 of file fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c. Return address = ffffffff814a8a88 XFS (pmem1): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x1) called from line 222 of file fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c. Return address = ffffffff814a8ef9 XFS (pmem1): Please umount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s) XFS: Assertion failed: xfs_isiflocked(ip), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h, line: 258 ..... Call Trace: xfs_iflush_abort+0x10a/0x110 xfs_iflush+0xf3/0x390 xfs_inode_item_push+0x126/0x1e0 xfsaild+0x2c5/0x890 kthread+0x11c/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Essentially, xfs_iflush_abort() has been called twice on the original inode that that was flushed. This happens because the inode has been flushed to teh buffer successfully via xfs_iflush_int(), and so when another inode is detected as corrupt in xfs_iflush_cluster, the buffer is marked stale and EIO, and iodone callbacks are run on it. Running the iodone callbacks walks across the original inode and calls xfs_iflush_abort() on it. When xfs_iflush_cluster() returns to xfs_iflush(), it runs the error path for that function, and that calls xfs_iflush_abort() on the inode a second time, leading to the above assert failure as the inode is not flush locked anymore. This bug has been there a long time. The simple fix would be to just avoid calling xfs_iflush_abort() in xfs_iflush() if we've got a failure from xfs_iflush_cluster(). However, xfs_iflush_cluster() has magic delwri buffer handling that means it may or may not have run IO completion on the buffer, and hence sometimes we have to call xfs_iflush_abort() from xfs_iflush(), and sometimes we shouldn't. After reading through all the error paths and the delwri buffer code, it's clear that the error handling in xfs_iflush_cluster() is unnecessary. If the buffer is delwri, it leaves it on the delwri list so that when the delwri list is submitted it sees a shutdown fliesystem in xfs_buf_submit() and that marks the buffer stale, EIO and runs IO completion. i.e. exactly what xfs+iflush_cluster() does when it's not a delwri buffer. Further, marking a buffer stale clears the _XBF_DELWRI_Q flag on the buffer, which means when submission of the buffer occurs, it just skips over it and releases it. IOWs, the error handling in xfs_iflush_cluster doesn't need to care if the buffer is already on a the delwri queue or not - it just needs to mark the buffer stale, EIO and run completions. That means we can just use the easy fix for xfs_iflush() to avoid the double abort. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Brian Foster Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong --- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c index 7a96c4e0ab5c..5df4de666cc1 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c @@ -3236,7 +3236,6 @@ xfs_iflush_cluster( struct xfs_inode *cip; int nr_found; int clcount = 0; - int bufwasdelwri; int i; pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino)); @@ -3360,37 +3359,22 @@ cluster_corrupt_out: * inode buffer and shut down the filesystem. */ rcu_read_unlock(); - /* - * Clean up the buffer. If it was delwri, just release it -- - * brelse can handle it with no problems. If not, shut down the - * filesystem before releasing the buffer. - */ - bufwasdelwri = (bp->b_flags & _XBF_DELWRI_Q); - if (bufwasdelwri) - xfs_buf_relse(bp); - xfs_force_shutdown(mp, SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_INCORE); - if (!bufwasdelwri) { - /* - * Just like incore_relse: if we have b_iodone functions, - * mark the buffer as an error and call them. Otherwise - * mark it as stale and brelse. - */ - if (bp->b_iodone) { - bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_DONE; - xfs_buf_stale(bp); - xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -EIO); - xfs_buf_ioend(bp); - } else { - xfs_buf_stale(bp); - xfs_buf_relse(bp); - } - } - /* - * Unlocks the flush lock + * We'll always have an inode attached to the buffer for completion + * process by the time we are called from xfs_iflush(). Hence we have + * always need to do IO completion processing to abort the inodes + * attached to the buffer. handle them just like the shutdown case in + * xfs_buf_submit(). */ + ASSERT(bp->b_iodone); + bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_DONE; + xfs_buf_stale(bp); + xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -EIO); + xfs_buf_ioend(bp); + + /* abort the corrupt inode, as it was not attached to the buffer */ xfs_iflush_abort(cip, false); kmem_free(cilist); xfs_perag_put(pag); @@ -3486,12 +3470,17 @@ xfs_iflush( xfs_log_force(mp, 0); /* - * inode clustering: - * see if other inodes can be gathered into this write + * inode clustering: try to gather other inodes into this write + * + * Note: Any error during clustering will result in the filesystem + * being shut down and completion callbacks run on the cluster buffer. + * As we have already flushed and attached this inode to the buffer, + * it has already been aborted and released by xfs_iflush_cluster() and + * so we have no further error handling to do here. */ error = xfs_iflush_cluster(ip, bp); if (error) - goto cluster_corrupt_out; + return error; *bpp = bp; return 0; @@ -3500,12 +3489,8 @@ corrupt_out: if (bp) xfs_buf_relse(bp); xfs_force_shutdown(mp, SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_INCORE); -cluster_corrupt_out: - error = -EFSCORRUPTED; abort_out: - /* - * Unlocks the flush lock - */ + /* abort the corrupt inode, as it was not attached to the buffer */ xfs_iflush_abort(ip, false); return error; } -- 2.11.0