From ed50a0890eaa8b4468097644b11a61a5f313860c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Ian King Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:31:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drivers/fsi: make a couple of functions static The functions fsi_slave_report_and_clear_errors and fsi_slave_handle_error are local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static. Cleans up sparse warnings: symbol 'fsi_slave_report_and_clear_errors' was not declared. Should it be static? symbol 'fsi_slave_handle_error' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c index 4ea63d9bd131..e318bf8c623c 100644 --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static int fsi_slave_calc_addr(struct fsi_slave *slave, uint32_t *addrp, return 0; } -int fsi_slave_report_and_clear_errors(struct fsi_slave *slave) +static int fsi_slave_report_and_clear_errors(struct fsi_slave *slave) { struct fsi_master *master = slave->master; uint32_t irq, stat; @@ -215,8 +215,8 @@ int fsi_slave_report_and_clear_errors(struct fsi_slave *slave) static int fsi_slave_set_smode(struct fsi_master *master, int link, int id); -int fsi_slave_handle_error(struct fsi_slave *slave, bool write, uint32_t addr, - size_t size) +static int fsi_slave_handle_error(struct fsi_slave *slave, bool write, + uint32_t addr, size_t size) { struct fsi_master *master = slave->master; int rc, link; -- 2.11.0