From fa47a16b04ad896ea9c10d4fa0caf47dcf47cd00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:18:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: test case to check whether src/dst regs got mangled by xadd We currently do not have such a test case in test_verifier selftests but it's important to test under bpf_jit_enable=1 to make sure JIT implementations do not mistakenly mess with src/dst reg for xadd/{w,dw}. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index f5f7bcc96046..41106d9d5cc7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -12005,6 +12005,46 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, }, { + "xadd/w check whether src/dst got mangled, 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0, 3), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, 2), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10, -8), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .retval = 3, + }, + { + "xadd/w check whether src/dst got mangled, 2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0, 3), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, 2), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10, -8), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .retval = 3, + }, + { "bpf_get_stack return R0 within range", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), -- 2.11.0