+++ /dev/null
-// Code generated by protoc-gen-go. DO NOT EDIT.
-// source: google/protobuf/field_mask.proto
-
-/*
-Package field_mask is a generated protocol buffer package.
-
-It is generated from these files:
- google/protobuf/field_mask.proto
-
-It has these top-level messages:
- FieldMask
-*/
-package field_mask
-
-import proto "github.com/golang/protobuf/proto"
-import fmt "fmt"
-import math "math"
-
-// Reference imports to suppress errors if they are not otherwise used.
-var _ = proto.Marshal
-var _ = fmt.Errorf
-var _ = math.Inf
-
-// This is a compile-time assertion to ensure that this generated file
-// is compatible with the proto package it is being compiled against.
-// A compilation error at this line likely means your copy of the
-// proto package needs to be updated.
-const _ = proto.ProtoPackageIsVersion2 // please upgrade the proto package
-
-// `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
-//
-// paths: "f.a"
-// paths: "f.b.d"
-//
-// Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
-// fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
-// message in `f.b`.
-//
-// Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
-// returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
-// Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
-//
-// # Field Masks in Projections
-//
-// When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
-// sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
-// specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
-// example is applied to a response message as follows:
-//
-// f {
-// a : 22
-// b {
-// d : 1
-// x : 2
-// }
-// y : 13
-// }
-// z: 8
-//
-// The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
-// (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
-// output):
-//
-//
-// f {
-// a : 22
-// b {
-// d : 1
-// }
-// }
-//
-// A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
-// paths string.
-//
-// If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
-// operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
-// had been specified).
-//
-// Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
-// top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
-// field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
-// list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
-// in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
-// other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
-// clearly documented together with its declaration in the API. In
-// any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
-// behavior for APIs.
-//
-// # Field Masks in Update Operations
-//
-// A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
-// targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
-// to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
-// and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
-// describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
-// fields not covered by the mask.
-//
-// If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, the existing
-// repeated values in the target resource will be overwritten by the new values.
-// Note that a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths`
-// string.
-//
-// If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
-// update operation, then the existing sub-message in the target resource is
-// overwritten. Given the target message:
-//
-// f {
-// b {
-// d : 1
-// x : 2
-// }
-// c : 1
-// }
-//
-// And an update message:
-//
-// f {
-// b {
-// d : 10
-// }
-// }
-//
-// then if the field mask is:
-//
-// paths: "f.b"
-//
-// then the result will be:
-//
-// f {
-// b {
-// d : 10
-// }
-// c : 1
-// }
-//
-// However, if the update mask was:
-//
-// paths: "f.b.d"
-//
-// then the result would be:
-//
-// f {
-// b {
-// d : 10
-// x : 2
-// }
-// c : 1
-// }
-//
-// In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
-// be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
-// Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
-// instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
-// not provide a mask as described below.
-//
-// If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
-// all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
-// Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
-// fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
-// the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
-// behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
-// a field mask, producing an error if not.
-//
-// As with get operations, the location of the resource which
-// describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
-// operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
-// required to be honored by the API.
-//
-// ## Considerations for HTTP REST
-//
-// The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
-// be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
-// (PUT must only be used for full updates).
-//
-// # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
-//
-// In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
-// separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
-// to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
-//
-// As an example, consider the following message declarations:
-//
-// message Profile {
-// User user = 1;
-// Photo photo = 2;
-// }
-// message User {
-// string display_name = 1;
-// string address = 2;
-// }
-//
-// In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
-//
-// mask {
-// paths: "user.display_name"
-// paths: "photo"
-// }
-//
-// In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
-//
-// {
-// mask: "user.displayName,photo"
-// }
-//
-// # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
-//
-// Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
-// following message:
-//
-// message SampleMessage {
-// oneof test_oneof {
-// string name = 4;
-// SubMessage sub_message = 9;
-// }
-// }
-//
-// The field mask can be:
-//
-// mask {
-// paths: "name"
-// }
-//
-// Or:
-//
-// mask {
-// paths: "sub_message"
-// }
-//
-// Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
-// paths.
-type FieldMask struct {
- // The set of field mask paths.
- Paths []string `protobuf:"bytes,1,rep,name=paths" json:"paths,omitempty"`
-}
-
-func (m *FieldMask) Reset() { *m = FieldMask{} }
-func (m *FieldMask) String() string { return proto.CompactTextString(m) }
-func (*FieldMask) ProtoMessage() {}
-func (*FieldMask) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) { return fileDescriptor0, []int{0} }
-
-func (m *FieldMask) GetPaths() []string {
- if m != nil {
- return m.Paths
- }
- return nil
-}
-
-func init() {
- proto.RegisterType((*FieldMask)(nil), "google.protobuf.FieldMask")
-}
-
-func init() { proto.RegisterFile("google/protobuf/field_mask.proto", fileDescriptor0) }
-
-var fileDescriptor0 = []byte{
- // 171 bytes of a gzipped FileDescriptorProto
- 0x1f, 0x8b, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0xff, 0xe2, 0x52, 0x48, 0xcf, 0xcf, 0x4f,
- 0xcf, 0x49, 0xd5, 0x2f, 0x28, 0xca, 0x2f, 0xc9, 0x4f, 0x2a, 0x4d, 0xd3, 0x4f, 0xcb, 0x4c, 0xcd,
- 0x49, 0x89, 0xcf, 0x4d, 0x2c, 0xce, 0xd6, 0x03, 0x8b, 0x09, 0xf1, 0x43, 0x54, 0xe8, 0xc1, 0x54,
- 0x28, 0x29, 0x72, 0x71, 0xba, 0x81, 0x14, 0xf9, 0x26, 0x16, 0x67, 0x0b, 0x89, 0x70, 0xb1, 0x16,
- 0x24, 0x96, 0x64, 0x14, 0x4b, 0x30, 0x2a, 0x30, 0x6b, 0x70, 0x06, 0x41, 0x38, 0x4e, 0x9d, 0x8c,
- 0x5c, 0xc2, 0xc9, 0xf9, 0xb9, 0x7a, 0x68, 0x5a, 0x9d, 0xf8, 0xe0, 0x1a, 0x03, 0x40, 0x42, 0x01,
- 0x8c, 0x51, 0x96, 0x50, 0x25, 0xe9, 0xf9, 0x39, 0x89, 0x79, 0xe9, 0x7a, 0xf9, 0x45, 0xe9, 0xfa,
- 0xe9, 0xa9, 0x79, 0x60, 0x0d, 0xd8, 0xdc, 0x64, 0x8d, 0x60, 0x2e, 0x62, 0x62, 0x76, 0x0f, 0x70,
- 0x5a, 0xc5, 0x24, 0xe7, 0x0e, 0x31, 0x21, 0x00, 0xaa, 0x5a, 0x2f, 0x3c, 0x35, 0x27, 0xc7, 0x3b,
- 0x2f, 0xbf, 0x3c, 0x2f, 0xa4, 0xb2, 0x20, 0xb5, 0x38, 0x89, 0x0d, 0x6c, 0x8c, 0x31, 0x20, 0x00,
- 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0x5a, 0xdb, 0x3a, 0xc0, 0xea, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
-}